-
By Richard Chou 周宇平
-
-
Taiwan’s traffic environment is not a problem that can be solved through aggressive fines for traffic violations or enhanced public awareness campaigns.
Pedstrians in the street, cars and motorcycles competing for lane space, illegal temporary parking and pedestrians struggling to cross the road have become part of everyday life. Has the traffic system spiraled out of control, or has this chaos long been creeping toward tolerance? As accidents and arguments continue to occur, Taiwanese have become accustomed to attributing the problem to individual infractions, overlooking the root cause of long-term systemic imbalance.
When observing road planning, a paradox emerges — red lines are ubiquitous, yet traffic flow shows little improvement. When completely prohibiting parking becomes the most common governance tactic, what it reflects is not an improvement in regulatory capacity but a decline in planning capabilities. The expansion of red lines just reduces the need to plan for parking spaces, enacting a blanket parking prohibition to minimize responsibility without resolving the underlying conflict between the demand for parking and the space available, causing recurring parking infractions.
Similarly, cars and motorcycles have long been forced to share poorly designed road space without a clear or consistent logic for traffic flow. Motorcycles are required to keep to the right, yet must constantly dodge illegally parked or temporarily stopped vehicles. Cars must operate within poorly configured lanes, leading to frequent clashes with motorcycles. In some cases, the incomplete design of designated motorcycle lanes can confuse drivers. These issues are not merely a matter of complying with traffic laws — the system itself makes conflict practically unavoidable.
More importantly, traffic management has gradually taken the form of a mere formality. Central regulations emphasize consistency and risk management, while local implementation tends to favor the more conservative, least error-prone approaches — such as the widespread use of red lines and no parking zones — rather than more nuanced, locally tailored road planning. The result is a system that lacks the room required for meaningful improvement, devolving into a mindset of prioritizing avoiding incidents over seeking progress.
When public awareness campaigns falter and infrastructure reforms stall, the burden of risk is ultimately borne by road users. Taiwan does not lack traffic regulations, nor does it lack road markings — what it lacks is a holistic traffic management mindset centered on people. No matter how many red lines are painted, they cannot produce safety. No matter how many slogans are conceived, they cannot deliver order. If the structural flaws in the system’s design are not addressed, enforcement and publicity campaigns would only serve as temporary solutions: They do nothing to solve the fundamental problem of road safety.
Richard Chou is an information security consultant.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
