The Supreme Court’s deepening division and declining public approval are for a clear reason, an analysis team has claimed. The judicial body has seen an overwhelming decline in its approval rating, hitting a rare low under Donald Trump’s second term in the Oval Office. Penn State professor Michael J. Nelson, political science professor Lee Epstein, and Washington University alumnus Andrew D. Martin conducted a survey of Supreme Court approval ratings and decision-making on more than 250 rulings between 2020 and 2024. What the trio concluded is that the polarization felt under the Trump administration is being reflected in the Supreme Court. Epstein told The Washington Post, “The polarization in American society seeps into the Senate. It seeps into the presidency. It is naturally going to seep into the courts. “It would be surprising to see another John Paul Stevens. Partisan identity and ideology have become so intertwined.” Epstein, Nelson, and Martin concluded that the Supreme Court had, for the last 50 years, typically leaned to the right in its decision-making. WaPo reporter Justin Jouvenal wrote, “Overall, the Supreme Court has consistently leaned to the right for 50 years. That pattern has persisted despite the country being closely divided politically and the White House and Congress regularly changing hands between Democrats and Republicans.””Republican presidents have had more opportunities to name justices than Democratic presidents have had. The current court has expanded upon the pattern.””One of the most notable findings of the data analysis was the court’s shift on civil rights, Epstein and Nelson said. Since the three Trump appointees joined the court, the share of cases won by the side advocating an expansion of civil rights fell to 44 percent.”A recent Gallup poll has also profiled the Supreme Court’s decline in approval, with 52% of Americans disapproving of how the judicial body had handled recent decisions. “Historically, it’s rare for the court’s approval rating to be underwater,” Jouvenal wrote.Analyst Nelson added, “The people see such a deep divide among the justices, it undermines the sense of procedural fairness and gives the sense that the cases are coming prejudged.””That’s why we have seen the court’s public standing fall so much. People look at it as a much more partisan institution than they did 20 years ago.”
Americas Drone Strategy Has a Supply Chain Problem
...
Read moreDetails
