-
By Yeh Yu-cheng 葉昱呈
-
-
The decision by five members of Iran’s women’s national soccer team to withdraw their asylum application in Australia has drawn global attention.
Reports suggest that the captain’s mother was summoned and pressured by the Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, forcing her and other team members to reverse course. The incident reveals how authoritarian power operates. Under such regimes, borders do not define the limits of control — intimidation does.
The use of family members as leverage is a familiar tactic across authoritarian systems. When a regime cannot directly control people abroad, it turns to those still within reach — summoning relatives, issuing threats, confiscating property or applying social pressure to force compliance. The Iranian case is particularly chilling, because it lays bare a brutal truth: Under authoritarian rule, a person’s freedom is often built on the risk borne by their family. What appears to be a personal choice is a coerced political compromise between safety and kinship.
In the past few years, China has repeatedly been accused of harassing and intimidating dissidents overseas. Through diaspora organizations, student groups and digital networks, Beijing has built systems of monitoring and mobilization beyond its borders. Those who openly criticize the regime face phone harassment, online smear campaigns, surveillance, and — most tellingly — pressure exerted through family members back home. This strategy of using family as leverage mirrors, almost exactly, what the Iranian player experienced.
This carries direct implications for Taiwan. If public officials hold Chinese citizenship or maintain deep ties of dependence with the Chinese state, questions of loyalty become structural vulnerabilities.
The Chinese Communist Party’s ability to exert pressure on people beyond its borders is well documented. If officials entrusted with sensitive information are subject to such leverage, the potential consequences are difficult to overstate.
The Iranian case offers a clear window into the nature of authoritarian politics. These regimes do not simply seek to control their own populations; they extend intimidation far beyond their borders. As countries around the world begin to recognize and respond to such transnational coercion, Taiwan cannot afford complacency. Only by drawing firm institutional boundaries — bolstering national security frameworks and clarifying standards of political loyalty — can it ensure that its democratic system is not infiltrated, coerced or gradually eroded.
Yeh Yu-cheng is a legal professional.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
