US Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Sunday was repeatedly put on the spot over the failure of US President Donald Trump to secure a cease-fire deal between Russia and Ukraine.Rubio appeared on news programs across all major networks on Sunday morning and he was asked on all of them about Trump’s summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin ending without any kind of agreement to end the conflict with Ukraine, which has now lasted for more than three years.During an interview on ABC’s “This Week,” Rubio was grilled by Martha Raddatz about the purported “progress” being made toward bringing the war to a close. She also zeroed in on Trump’s own statements saying that he wanted to see Russia agree to a cease-fire by the end of last week’s summit.”The president went in to that meeting saying he wanted a ceasefire, and there would be consequences if they didn’t agree on a ceasefire in that meeting, and they didn’t agree to a ceasefire,” she said. “So where are the consequences?””That’s not the aim of this,” Rubio replied. “First of all…””The president said that was the aim!” Raddatz interjected.”Yeah, but you’re not going to reach a cease-fire or a peace agreement in a meeting in which only one side is represented,” Rubio replied. “That’s why it’s important to bring both leaders together, that’s the goal here.”Rubio also made an appearance on CBS’ “Face the Nation,” where host Margaret Brennan similarly pressed him about the expectations Trump had set going into the summit.”The president told those European leaders last week he wanted a ceasefire,” she pointed out. “He went on television and said he would walk out of the meeting if Putin didn’t agree to one, he said there would be severe consequences if he didn’t agree to one. He said he’d walk out in two minutes—he spent three hours talking to Vladimir Putin and he did not get one. So there’s mixed messages here.””Our goal is not to stage some production for the world to say, ‘Oh, how dramatic, he walked out,'” Rubio shot back. “Our goal is to have a peace agreement to end this war, OK? And obviously we felt, and I agreed, that there was enough progress, not a lot of progress, but enough progress made in those talks to allow us to move to the next phase.”Rubio then insisted that now was not the time to hit Russia with new sanctions, despite Trump’s recent threats to do so, because it would end talks all together.During an appearance on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” host Kristen Welker asked Rubio about the “severe consequences” Trump had promised for Russia if it did not agree to a cease-fire.”Why not impose more sanctions on [Russia] and force them to agree to a cease-fire, instead of accepting that Putin won’t agree to one?” Welker asked.”Well, first, that’s something that I think a lot of people go around saying that I don’t necessarily think is true,” he replied. “I don’t think new sanctions on Russia are going to force them to accept a cease-fire. They are already under severe sanctions… you can argue that could be a consequence of refusing to agree to a cease-fire or the end of hostilities.”He went on to say that he hoped the US would not be forced to put more sanctions on Russia “because that means peace talks failed.”During the 2024 presidential campaign, Trump said that he could end the war between Russian and Ukraine within the span of a single day. In the seven months since his inauguration, the war has only gotten more intense as Russia has stepped up its daily attacks on Ukrainian cities and infrastructure.
Malen joins Roma after a year at Villa
...
Read moreDetails
