After then-Vice President Kamala Harris narrowly lost the 2024 presidential election, cable news was full of pundits reflecting on possible reasons for her loss. And a recuring theme was “Democrats have a problem.”Many of the conversations exaggerated the margins of Donald Trump’s victory. It was a close election, with Trump defeating Harris by a margin of just 1.5 percent in the national popular vote. And many of the swing states that Trump won found him doing so by small single-digit margins, including Michigan, North Carolina and Pennsylvania.Almost three months into Trump’s second term, the “Democrats have a problem” argument continues to be made — and more often by Democrats themselves. And The Atlantic’s Mark Leibovich argues it has become counterproductive. READ MORE: How Trump’s economic policies imperil the ‘far-right parties’ he claims to support”Democrats have a problem: too many problems,” Leibovich writes. “Identifying the problems is not one of those problems. ‘Democrats have a trust problem,’ suggests Rep. Jason Crow of Colorado. ‘Democrats have a big narrative problem,’ adds Rep. Greg Casar of Texas. ‘Democrats have a vision problem,’ says Rep. Ro Khanna of California.”Leibovich adds, “In general, Democrats have a ‘Democrats have a problem’ problem…. Here’s another problem: Problems are tedious. Talk about them endlessly, and people will start to avoid you at parties. It can foster self-loathing — and exacerbate the Democrats’ preexisting ‘big problem with its own voters.'”According to Leibovich, Democrats and Republicans both “tend to over-dissect their problems and defeats.””Every party that loses an election supposedly risks becoming a ‘permanent minority,'” Leibovich observes. “This concern usually lasts no longer than an election cycle or two. ‘Permanent’ minorities usually turn out to be temporary.”READ MORE: ‘This. Will. Not. End. Well’: George Will slams Trump’s ‘fanciful assumptions’ on economyRead Mark Leibovich’s full article for The Atlantic at this link (subscription required).