‘Suppression of the truth’: Legal experts blast Judge Cannon for blocking Jack Smith report

On Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon issued a ruling temporarily blocking the release of Department of Justice special counsel Jack Smith’s final report in the waning days of President Joe Biden’s administration.The three-page order prevents Smith, Attorney General Merrick Garland, the Biden DOJ and “all of their officers, agents, and employees, and all persons acting in active concert or participation with such individuals” from “releasing, sharing, or transmitting the Final Report or any drafts of such Report outside the Department of Justice.” But as Politico’s Kyle Cheney reports, Cannon — who then-President Donald Trump appointed to the federal bench in 2020 — may not have the jurisdiction to intervene in the publication of the report, which is required by the federal special counsel statute. Whether the report sees the light of day will ultimately rest with the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals, which has overturned Cannon’s rulings on two previous occasions. Legal nonprofit National Security Counselors posted to Bluesky that the 11th Circuit, which meets next week, is not likely to go agree with Cannon’s decision.READ MORE: Judge Aileen Cannon failed to disclose a right-wing junket”[T]hey get the final say, and they’re not going to play the delay game that Trump really wanted Cannon to play,” the organization wrote.Portland, Oregon-based attorney Patrick De Klotz observed that Cannon’s decision was handed down right around the same time the president-elect praised the judge as “brilliant” during a Tuesday press conference at his Mar-a-Lago estate. And civil rights lawyer Subodh Chandra condemned Cannon for “aiding and abetting suppression of the truth,” adding: “Shame. Shame. Shame.”Other legal experts speculated that Cannon’s move was less about the report itself and more about her jockeying for a position on the Supreme Court. Attorney Jeffrey Evan Gold, who is a legal analyst for CNN, NBC, ABC and others, responded to the news of Cannon blocking the report’s release by referring to her as “Justice Cannon.” Northeastern Illinois University political science professor William Adler wrote that Americans should “get used to” saying “Supreme Court nominee Aileen Cannon.” And Politico magazine contributor Joshua Zeitz opined that it was “pretty easy to see how this goes.””Alito will retire, Trump will name her to the court, and she’ll easily be confirmed with unanimous GOP support and a handful of older Democratic Senators who think it’s still 1978,” Zeitz wrote.READ MORE: ‘Terminate all efforts’: Trump fighting to keep Jack Smith’s final report hidden from publicClick here to read Cheney’s full report in Politico, and click here to read the full text of Cannon’s order.

Read Full Article