Summary
- Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) caucus whip Huang Kuo-chang and Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Weng Hsiao-ling are prominent figures in the new legislature.
- Both Huang and Weng, with doctorates in law from prestigious universities, were unable to define key legal terms when questioned by Justice Yu Po-hsiang in the Constitutional Court.
- Despite being seen as specialists in constitutional and administrative law, the pair struggled to provide clear definitions and explanations.
- The article questions the depth of legal knowledge possessed by these lawmakers and highlights the importance of objective truth in legal proceedings.
