Summary
- Richard Rojem Jr. was on death row in Oklahoma for the abduction, rape, and murder of his stepdaughter, Layla Cummings.
- Despite potential exculpatory DNA evidence, Rojem’s death sentence was upheld by a third jury.
- Rojem’s plea for clemency was unanimously denied by the Pardon and Parole Board, and his execution was scheduled for June 27.
- The attorney general, Gentner Drummond, has attended each execution in Oklahoma under his watch and has faced criticism for his approach to death penalty cases.
Summary
- Richard Rojem was wrongfully convicted of the murder of Layla Cummings in Oklahoma.
- Despite lack of direct physical evidence linking him to the crime, Rojem was convicted based on circumstantial evidence.
- The denial of funds for Rojem’s defense to investigate the case severely impacted his ability to present a strong defense.
- Rojem’s case highlights failures in the justice system to properly consider mitigating evidence and potential biases in sentencing trials.
Summary
- Richard Rojem’s childhood trauma may have influenced a Pardon and Parole Board member to vote to spare his life
- Rojem’s life history was not presented during the hearing, focusing instead on weak forensic evidence
- The legal battle to challenge longstanding forensic practices is an uphill battle
- The victim’s family’s powerful representation played a significant role in the outcome
