Summary
- A UK judge ruled against Japanese professor Nana Sato-Rossberg, stating that discussing sushi with her boss was not racist
- Sato-Rossberg accused her boss of racial discrimination for mentioning Japanese food, but the tribunal found no evidence of discrimination
- The tribunal determined that Sato-Rossberg was predisposed to see race discrimination where there was none
- The professor’s hypersensitivity and preconceived notions were highlighted as factors influencing her perception
