In a significant statement that has caught the attention of NATO allies, Latvia’s Foreign Minister Krisjanis Karins has underscored the potential impact of introducing conscription on strengthening Europe’s defenses against Russia. This proposition comes as Latvia itself revisits mandatory military service, aiming to fortify its armed forces in response to ongoing tensions in the region.
Karins, speaking from a security conference in Germany, shared Latvia’s recent decision to reinstate conscription, a move motivated by the Russian invasion of Ukraine, now in its third year. Latvia’s plan to effectively double its armed forces by 2032 to a total of 61,000 personnel highlights a strategic approach to bolster defense capabilities through a mix of professional soldiers and trained reservists.
The foreign minister elaborated on the dual purpose of conscription: enhancing the professional army with well-equipped and trained reservists without replacing it. His advocacy for conscription extends to larger NATO countries, suggesting that their participation could significantly impact European defense.
The UK’s stance on the matter, as conveyed by Defence Secretary Grant Shapps, remains cautious. While acknowledging the historical precedents for conscription during world wars, Shapps emphasized the current focus on maintaining a highly trained professional force, with no immediate plans for conscription or voluntary training programs.
In Latvia, the reintroduction of conscription is seen as more than just a military strategy. Major General Andis Dilans, Latvia’s second most senior commander, views it as a cornerstone of democracy, enhancing the bond between the military and the public, particularly in times of crisis or war. This initiative not only aims to prepare citizens for defense but also to instill a sense of national service and obligation.
As debates on conscription continue, Latvia’s example offers a compelling case for reconsidering military service within NATO, not just as a defense strategy but as a commitment to democratic values and national security.
