Alec Baldwin could potentially face renewed charges in connection with the tragic shooting of “Rust” cinematographer Halyna Hutchins, following a significant breakthrough in gun analysis. A recent comprehensive study conducted by ballistics and forensic testing experts in Arizona and New Mexico examined the Colt .45 revolver used on the film set, specifically focusing on markings left on a spent cartridge.
The conclusive findings of this analysis have raised questions about Baldwin’s repeated assertions that he did not pull the trigger. Despite Baldwin’s denials, the study’s results suggest that the trigger of the revolver had to have been either pulled or depressed for the firearm to discharge. Lucien Haag of Forensic Science Services in Arizona led the report, which stated that the tragic incident occurred when the hammer was manually retracted to a fully rearward and cocked position, followed by the subsequent pull or depression of the trigger.
The examination relied on replacement components to reconstruct the gun, as some parts had been damaged during prior testing by the FBI. As a result of these new findings, there is potential for the reconsideration of charges against Baldwin. New Mexico special prosecutor Kari Morrissey, who is handling the “Rust” case, has indicated that a formal decision on whether to refile charges is pending, though no specific timeline has been provided.
Baldwin, aged 65, has consistently maintained that the shooting was accidental and occurred while he was following instructions to point the gun in Hutchins’ direction during rehearsal. He has denied pulling the trigger, asserting that he only pulled back the hammer before the firearm discharged, fatally striking Hutchins on October 21, 2021, at a movie ranch near Santa Fe.
In April, special prosecutors dropped an involuntary manslaughter charge against Baldwin without prejudice, citing the possibility that the revolver may have been modified before the incident, potentially leading to a malfunction. The recent gun analysis has prompted a reevaluation of the case and may impact future legal proceedings.
